Money And Markets Watchdog
  • Top News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Politic
  • Editor’s Pick
Top Posts
Iran summons Australian ambassador over post that ‘promoted...
NBC ripped up its Olympics playbook for 2024...
DOJ charges Hamas leaders over ‘terrorist atrocities’ in...
John McCain’s son says he will support Kamala...
Student leaders reveal prison ‘nightmare’ after Gen Z...
Trump plans to plead not guilty to Jack...
China kicks off major African summit as it...
Kamala Harris still unclear on whether she would...
GOP leaders vow ‘action’ as Columbia University swarmed...
Trump is ‘getting ready’ for debate by ramping...
  • Top News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Politic
  • Editor’s Pick

Money And Markets Watchdog

InvestingPolitic

Ramaswamy urges Supreme Court to overturn Colorado decision, files amicus brief in support of Trump

by January 12, 2024
January 12, 2024
Ramaswamy urges Supreme Court to overturn Colorado decision, files amicus brief in support of Trump
Read this article for free!
Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!
Please enter a valid email address.
By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy has filed an amicus brief at the Supreme Court in support of former President Donald Trump’s efforts to remain on state ballots.

‘President Trump’s political opponents have sought to disqualify him from the ballot in multiple states because they fear they cannot beat him in a free and fair election,’ Ramaswamy noted in the filing. ‘Needless to say, the distress of competing against a formidable opponent cannot justify disqualification under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The consequences of affirming the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision will extend far beyond the dispute over President Trump’s eligibility.’

‘Specifically, this Court’s blessing of the state supreme court’s interpretation of Section 3 will warp incentives for state decision-makers and voters alike,’ Ramaswamy added in the filing. ‘For secretaries of state and state supreme court justices, the path to national notoriety will be illuminated: To enhance your credibility among copartisans, simply concoct a reason to declare a disfavored presidential candidate of the opposing party ineligible to run for office.’

‘For voters, the message will be equally clear: Scour the records of disfavored candidates for speeches containing martial rhetoric, or even policies that had unintended consequences, and then file challenges under Section 3. The number of Section 3 complaints will proliferate, as will the number of divergent outcomes.’

The amicus brief was filed Thursday as the Supreme Court gears up to hear arguments on whether Trump should remain on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot. The justices said they will hear the case on an expedited basis, with arguments on February 8.

The justices issued an administrative stay that orders the Colorado Secretary of State to put the former president’s name on the GOP primary ballot, at least until the case is decided. The high court said that the briefs are due by January 31.

Ramaswamy said Wednesday that he planned to file the amicus brief at the Supreme Court in hopes that it would ‘overturn Coloarado’s disastrous decision to try to keep Donald Trump off the ballot.’

In the clip announcing the filing, Ramaswamy said the court should overturn Colorado’s decision because it’s ‘the right thing to do for this country.’

‘I feel a sense of obligation to do that as somebody who understands the Constitution,’ he said. ‘It’s my belief that every other Republican, myself included, needs to withdraw from any ballot that forcibly withdraws Donald Trump from the primary.’

The Colorado Supreme Court decision was the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment was used to bar a presidential contender from the ballot. 

The state’s highest court concluded that Trump ‘engaged in insurrection’ over his role in the January 6, 2021, protests at the U.S. Capitol.

The historical hearing will consider the meaning of the 14th Amendment, which bars people who ‘engaged in insurrection’ from holding public office. 

The amendment was adopted in 1868, following the Civil War.

Fox News’ Sarah Rumpf-Whitten contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
previous post
Fetterman blasts South Africa ‘genocide’ case against Israel amid unrest, crime: ‘Sit this one out’
next post
Department of Defense Inspector General announces review of Lloyd Austin hospitalization

You may also like

Trump’s critical VP pick: 5 key criteria the...

May 7, 2024

Happy 95th birthday, Dr. King, and may our...

January 15, 2024

Can New Chef Milei Change Argentina’s Recipe?

December 29, 2023

Conservative group rips Biden in blistering Rachel Morin...

June 27, 2024

Sen. Joe Manchin calls on Biden to step...

July 21, 2024

Expert warns of ‘chilling reality’ TikTok threat poses:...

April 15, 2024

Venezuelans will keep fighting for democracy. They have...

August 24, 2024

Senate Republicans prepare for long haul in fight...

February 9, 2024

Country megastar Morgan Wallen canceled the Cancel Culture...

January 15, 2024

Biden replacement? Whitmer denies ‘Draft Gretch’ campaign, but...

July 4, 2024

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2024 moneyandmarketswatchdog.com | All Rights Reserved